Type Here to Get Search Results !

The Real Reason Jamie Dornan has no Love Scenes in the 'Fifty Shades of Grey'

Jamie Dornan told Ella in a February 2018 interview that rumors that he had been offered an extra $1 million to film n*de scenes for Fifty Shades Freed were false, joking that it was 'actually $30 million - to show a testicle'. . As a result, he may never have refused to be n*de on screen.



"I don't know if I said I wouldn't," she explained, noting that viewers saw many co-stars Dakota Johnson's breasts, as well as her own bare bottom. 'I just thought, 'We don't need to show the rest if it's not essential to the story.' We're not doing porn, as much as people think we are.

 


The Real Reason Jamie Dornan has no Love Scenes in the 'Fifty Shades of Grey'


 



In the Fifty Shades of Gray film trilogy, Dornan says that he carried a 'modest bag', and hearing him say it, he probably would have preferred to be n*ked.

You are presented with a few options and sizes. They are all the color of the skin, but, for example, if he had had jaundice. That color Like a sick person,' Ella said. I chose one. They had all left the room. As I was putting it on, I saw a little tag sewn inside. It said: 'Inmate No. 3.' '

Dornan said he thought it had been used, adding: 'I almost threw up. When my genitals stopped at the bottom of this, I thought, 'Someone has used this.' I actually called the locker room attendant. I was like, 'Dude, what the hell? Is this second hand? He said, 'No, trust me.' But he lost my trust.




In fact, Fifty Shades Freed director James Foley told Entertainment Tonight that Dornan did film some full frontal n*dity scenes, but they just didn't make sense within the story and were left out of the final cut of the film.

'[Dornan and I] never talked [about the use of full frontal n*dity]. But in the final cut, I'm being totally honest, it just didn't come out... The full frontal would have been kind of a deliberate cut, to see that for no reason,'' Foley said. "There are a lot of papers where it is, but it just wasn't the final cut for dramatic reasons."





Jamie Dornan himself echoed the sentiment to Entertainment Tonight, explaining: 'I feel like if it's a story to watch more of, then I'm all for it. If I don't think it adds anything or I don't think it's necessary to move the story forward, then I don't think I need to see that part of me or that part of Dakota. It just becomes free if we don't need it.



Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.

Below Post Ad