When one thinks of Sharp Magazine, the immediate association is often with feminism – a platform that celebrates strong women supporting each other without diminishing the importance of men or fellow women. However, Meghan Markle's recent appearance in the magazine has raised eyebrows, casting a shadow over her alignment with these feminist ideals.
Behind her seemingly perfect facade, there's a growing perception that Meghan is not what she appears to be. Her smile, at times, appears forced, and the cracks in her carefully constructed image are becoming increasingly visible.
In a surprising move, Meghan graced the pages of Sharp Magazine, a publication primarily targeted at a male audience. The photo shoot featured her dressed in an alluring black lace outfit, reclining on a plush couch. These images, presented alongside pictures of other women in similar attire, sparked chatter on Twitter, hinting at a possible connection to escort services.
The accompanying article, however, provides little new information, recycling much of what Meghan has already shared about herself. She highlights her intelligence, her work at the Argentinian Embassy, and her humanitarian endeavors. But critics argue that Meghan's self-centeredness, penchant for embellishing her achievements, and her willingness to embrace objectification are in stark contrast to her proclaimed ideals.
Speculation abounds about Meghan's motivations. While financial gain might be one aspect, it's equally likely that she seeks to boost her profile in pursuit of more acting opportunities. This, in turn, could attract affluent and influential suitors. Even the insinuation of escort involvement could serve as a means to elevate her public image.
Despite Meghan's portrayal of herself as a feminist "girl boss," there is a disconcerting irony in light of the allegations against her. According to Valentin Low's book, "Courteous: The Hidden Power Behind the Crown," Meghan's behavior during her tenure as a working royal was so disturbing that some staff labeled her a narcissistic sociopath.
What's noteworthy is that many of these allegations came from women who had worked closely with Meghan. One instance stands out where Meghan berated a young female staffer in front of her colleagues. When the staffer expressed concerns about Meghan's plan and suggested that coming up with an alternative on short notice would be challenging, Meghan responded callously, implying that she preferred someone else handle it if available.
Prince William witnessed this exchange and provided comfort to the distressed staffer, assuring her of her competence, a gesture that reportedly moved her to tears. Such allegations are perplexing, given Meghan's professed ambition to be Britain's equivalent of Beyoncé.
According to a source, Meghan's behavior left many young women emotionally shattered, with one colleague contemplating resignation due to the couple's alleged bullying behavior. It's disheartening to consider the possibility that Meghan Markle may be one of those privileged individuals who project sweetness on the surface but treat their subordinates poorly.
The book takes a more shocking turn, claiming that Meghan and Harry's mistreatment of staff extended even to the most senior members, including their private secretary, Samantha Cohen, a loyal servant to the Royals for 17 years. These revelations stand in stark contrast to Meghan's self-congratulatory brand of feminism.
The dissonance becomes especially apparent when we recall Meghan's remarks during the 2019 International Women's Day panel, convened by the Queen's Commonwealth Trust. She emphasized the significance of women supporting each other and asserted that women standing together is an empowering force rather than a threat. Unfortunately, Meghan's actions appear to tell a different story than her words.
