In the intricate web of royal dynamics, Prince Harry occupies a unique and
somewhat challenging position, one that has left King Charles in a somewhat
powerless predicament.
As the monarch, King Charles finds himself in a somewhat delicate situation
due to the evolving circumstances involving his son, Prince Harry. Despite his
lofty status, he appears to have limited authority in this particular matter.
Prince Harry still retains the title of one of the counsellors of the state, a
role that would necessitate his involvement should his father ever be
indisposed or absent from the realm. However, a fundamental requirement for
this role is that the royal in question must maintain a permanent residence
within the United Kingdom.
The twist in the tale lies in the fact that Harry and Meghan were compelled to
vacate Frogmore Cottage, their Windsor abode, back in June. In strict
accordance with the law, this event should have prompted his removal from the
list of counsellors. However, intriguingly, reports suggest that King Charles
had an opportunity to invoke counsellor of state legislation to effect this
change last year but consciously chose not to do so.
Speculation has also swirled around the possibility of Charles extending an
olive branch to his younger son by offering him a suitable residence to
circumvent this legal conundrum. Nevertheless, the Palace has firmly denied
these rumors, asserting that such claims are devoid of truth.
Furthermore, a close confidant of the King, speaking to The Sunday Times,
revealed that the reason for Harry's continued retention of the position is
rooted in a desire to avoid any perception of hostility. The friend
emphasized, "Removing him from the role would be interpreted as an act of
antagonism, and that's something he wishes to avoid at all costs."
The same source concluded, "If, as a result, it becomes necessary to designate
a royal estate as a pied-à-terre for his son, that would indeed seem like a
reasonable course of action."
