Type Here to Get Search Results !

Meghan Markle Faces Ban from Vancouver Locals and JFG Over Pendant Snub

Meghan Markle Faces Ban from Vancouver Locals and JFG Over Pendant Snub

Accusations of disrespect towards Vancouver locals and Justice for Girls (JFG) have arisen as Meghan Markle declined to wear a pendant generously donated by the organization, dismissing it as inexpensive. 

Prince Harry's recent visit to a Vancouver-based organization supporting disadvantaged adolescent females marked Meghan's second visit to JFG in the past three years. Established in 1999, JFG holds special status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council since 2009, recognizing The Duchess's longstanding advocacy for girls and women's rights.

During her inaugural visit in January 2020, JFG presented Markle with a gold and diamond pendant, a donation from local jeweler Holly Bartlett, an esteemed Hila Tribe member. Co-director of JFG, Zoe Craig Sparrow, praised the Duchess's comfort and ease during her visit. 

However, during her 2023 visit, Meghan opted not to wear the custom-made gold necklace, choosing alternative jewelry. This decision sparked speculation about the pendant's whereabouts and raised questions about her commitment to feminist principles.

Analogies have been drawn between this incident and one where Catherine wore earrings presented by a bereaved mother on Mental Health Day, emphasizing the potential offense Meghan's apparent disregard for this important piece could cause to the indigenous jeweler and the girls involved. Additionally, concerns arise about Meghan's potential disregard for indigenous partners at the upcoming Invictus Games in 2025.

Notably, instead of showcasing her engagement jewelry, Meghan displayed a pink diamond ring during her visit. Detractors argue that she would have understood the significance of wearing jewelry and accessories procured or bestowed by the visited locals had she worked more closely with the late Queen and Royal staff. This is seen as a potent diplomatic gesture, as exemplified by the late Queen, Prince Philip, their children, spouses, and descendants, who often engage in such practices to foster diplomatic ties.

Skepticism surrounds Meghan's long-term commitment to the organization, with allegations that she may not be deeply involved in significant work in the United States and that such visits serve more as photo opportunities than substantive engagement. This approach starkly contrasts with the Royal Family's customary practice of using fashion and accessories to convey esteem and foster diplomatic ties.

Meanwhile, Meghan Markle faces criticism, accused of being caught in a cycle of diminishing returns. Experts have recently started discussing Meghan Markle's unofficial spokesperson, Elet Scobey. These claims were brought to light by commentator Matthew Lassa during a candid interview with GB News. Lassa expressed concerns about Meghan possibly briefing Scobey with stories against the Royal Family, stating that it appears somewhat desperate.

He also noted that with Royal biographies, there's usually one that makes a big impact, but then they tend to lose steam with subsequent releases. Meghan's unofficial spokesperson, Elet Scobey, is set to release a book titled "End Game," promising an in-depth investigation into the current state of the British Monarchy, including an unpopular king, a power-hungry heir, a queen willing to go to great lengths to preserve her image, and a prince forced to start a new life after feeling betrayed by his own family.

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.

Below Post Ad