Addressing the controversy surrounding the use of the name Lilibet and previous claims that the late Queen gave her blessing, Dr Shola emphasized that it was out of respect, not necessity. She argued that the name Lilibet predates Queen Elizabeth, and the late monarch didn't own or create it.
Dr Shola questioned the credibility of the unnamed sources and aides in the recent claims, expressing disbelief at the notion that the late Queen would be 'angry' at her great-grandchild being named in her honor. She criticized the spurious claims, suggesting they only aim to damage the character and judgment of the late Queen.
In conclusion, Dr Shola asserted that the Daily Mail's coverage has exploited the situation, defaming Harry and Meghan while shamefully dredging up a dead Queen's name for profit.
The claims arose from Robert Hardman's new book, 'Charles III: New King, New Court. The Inside Story,' where a source alleged that the late Queen was "as angry as I'd ever seen her" after Meghan and Harry stated they had her blessing to use her childhood nickname for their daughter, Lilibet.
