King Charles' battle with cancer has sparked speculation about the future of the monarchy, evoking unsettling memories of Britain's imperial history.
In a piece for News.com.au, royal commentator Daniella Elser explored the potential scenario of Prince William stepping in as regent should the King's health worsen.
For context, King Charles is currently undergoing cancer treatment, diagnosed during a procedure for an enlarged prostate earlier this year.
Elser highlighted the need for Britons to familiarize themselves with regency, a provision allowing the next in line to the throne to assume royal duties when the reigning monarch is incapacitated, as reported by the New York Post.
"This unexpected twist is deeply unsettling," Elser remarked.
Royal author Tina Brown echoed similar concerns in a recent New York Times column, noting that William and Kate Middleton are grappling with "intense anxiety" over the potential role.
Elser further speculated, "William and Kate are likely fervently praying" to avoid being thrust into such a responsibility.
As a regent, Prince Charles would assume all royal duties, including weekly meetings with UK officials, granting Royal Assent to bills, and overseeing State openings of parliaments.
Elser concluded that the notion of regency, particularly in the context of King Charles' health, is "profoundly disturbing."
She tempered her analysis with a positive note on the King's recent public appearance at an Easter Sunday service, attended by a select group of family members.
