Monarch’s absence from civil ceremony rooted in royal duty, not personal disapproval
When Charles and Camilla tied the knot on April 9, 2005, royal watchers quickly noticed the absence of one key figure—Queen Elizabeth II. At the time, her decision not to attend the civil wedding at Windsor Guildhall led to speculation that she disapproved of the union.
However, according to Charles’ official biographer, Jonathan Dimbleby, the Queen’s decision was not based on personal sentiment but on her role as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. As civil ceremonies were not traditionally embraced by the Church, her absence was a reflection of constitutional responsibility rather than any rejection of the marriage.
“The Prince would have liked her to be there,” Dimbleby noted, “but she was absolutely firm in her decision—not out of rejection to the marriage, but out of respect for her constitutional responsibilities.”
While she skipped the ceremony itself, Queen Elizabeth attended the reception afterward and offered a warm, humorous speech that reportedly charmed the guests and dispelled any lingering doubts about her support.
Her gracious appearance at the celebration stood as a powerful example of her ability to uphold tradition while also showing personal support for her family.
